About us
Introduction
Adv. Priyam Agrawal and Adv. Tanuj Rattan believes in serving the needs of society at the national level. Our firm believes that a good relationship is what defines the connection between an advocate and the client, we deeply support and understand the views of our clients, and we ensure valuable support to our clients and make sure that legal disputes of our clients are dealt with efficiently and amicably. We provide systematic legal aid to the ones who seek it, for any legal query contact us on the provided contact details/email.
PROPRIETOR
(BALLB, LLM)
ASSOCIATE
(BALLB, LLM)
Our Vision
Our vision is to solve the legal problems and queries of our clients by suggesting the best possible way to settle their legal problems and queries, by conducting series of legal consultations by our team.
Our Mission
Our mission is to represent our clients in the court of law with utmost sincerity and without causing any redundant delays in handling their cases.
Core Values
We make sure that our clients are given the opportunity to speak their hearts out, so that they can get a much clearer view of their legal problem from a lawyer's point of view.
About Us
Adv. Priyam Agrawal and Adv. Tanuj Rattan trying to serve the needs of the society and thereby contributing towards the development of the nation. As advocates we try to discover new ways of handling various legal matters, we try to resolve the disputes of our clients through the way of representing them in the “court of law”.
We not only believe in understanding our clients but also believe in maintaining a healthy bond with our clients. As associates, we have the skills and experience to give seamless legal services and advice to clients pertaining to various legal matters. In order to support economically weaker sections of society, we provide free consultation/legal aid.
We believe in creating a healthy atmosphere for working as professionals by adopting ethical ways of dealing with legal matters that come before us.
“Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do”